I’m familiar with your country; I love your country … anything I can do to make the relationship with India better, I’m willing and enthusiastic about doing so. —
Freshman representative Curt Clawson, who mistook Nisha Biswal and Arun Kumar, two Americans who hold positions in the State Department and Commerce Department respectively, as representatives from India. (via officialssay)
KGW: A US district judge ruled Oregon’s gay marriage ban is unconstitutional on Monday.
Officials in Oregon’s largest county, Multnomah, say they plan to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples immediately.
Follow the latest at Breaking News.
Yeah, no, this whole chain letter thing making the rounds today is a lie. The date is wrong, the numbers are mostly wrong, the bill is wrong, and the Democrats-only thing is wrong.
ETA: I mean, I would be thrilled if the numbers were real. That all looks pretty good to me. But this is the latest “forwards from the uncle you avoid at Thanksgiving” tomfoolery, and you know I like pointing out when Republicans are wrong about things.
Ha! I was reading this thinking, “Good. Good. Very good. How did I not know all these great tax increases were happening?!”
America’s founding fathers were a bunch of white supremacist misogynists. Like I give a FUCK what kind of country they would have wanted America to be.
If you were a computer-loving male child who took a lot of shit from your peers, I suspect you heard something similar from the adults in your life. Maybe it was “Sure, things are bad now, but when you’re a little bit older, women will LOVE guys like you!” Or maybe it was “That kid who makes fun of you now will be working at a gas station when you run a big fancy computer company and marry a supermodel!” If you were once young, nerdy and male, it is not unlikely that your future sense of self-worth was funded with a non-consensual IOU from the world’s women. It’s taken me a long time, but at this point I genuinely believe that much of this “GEEKS SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH” rhetoric is little more than patriarchy’s bespectacled wingman. It excuses the pain that systems of power exert on children by promising little boys future dominion over little girls. It is deeply and massively fucked. —
What (Else) Can Men Do? Grow The Fuck Up. — Medium (via imamandanelson)
oh my god this…
It’s taken me a long time, but at this point I genuinely believe that much of this “GEEKS SHALL INHERIT THE EARTH” rhetoric is little more than patriarchy’s bespectacled wingman.
Are computer-loving female children fed these same lines? Are they told “SOME DAY YOU WILL HAVE ALL THE MONEY AND POWERS AND MEN WILL FLOCK TO YOU LIKE AUTONOMY-DEPRIVED MAN-ZOMBIES?” If you insist that the presence of enough computers magically transforms the world into a meritocracy, you might want to think about that one for a second.
love the classism there too like “someday you will be better than those other people because you will have more money and a ‘real’ job” like hooray that’s not toxic AT ALL
and it adds an extra layer of sexism because lol women are gold-diggers amirite, that’s all you need to attract women, is a fat paycheck — not, you know, personal merits of some kind beyond a marketable skill (not that a good work ethic isn’t a desirable trait in a partner but that can’t be all you’ve got)
male entitlement becomes more explicable — NOT more excusable, but easier to understand — when we look at how many promises of this kind are made. “if you just do x y and z then you will get women” oh well no wonder you’re mad, you did x y and z and the women aren’t falling at your doorstep, it’s still your fault you didn’t figure out we’re people at some point but it’s not like you were encouraged to learn that
though some men manage somehow so I sure don’t feel sorry for your whiny ass (cumaeansibyl)
That sentence – that motivation for the report – may show deep, emotional feeling on the part of the senator, but I don’t think it leads you to an objective report. — Former CIA and NSA director MIchael Hayden, on Sen. Diane Feinstein’s motivations behind the CIA interrogation report: to “ensure that an un-American, brutal program of detention and interrogation will never again be considered or permitted.” (via officialssay)
Sexist piece of shit.
You mean the generation that paid three times as much for college to enter a job market with triple the unemployment isn’t interested in purchasing the assets of the generation who just blew an enormous housing bubble and kept it from popping through quantitative easing and out-and-out federal support? Curious. — When comments are better than the article, Atlantic edition (“The Cheapest Generation: Why Millennials aren’t buying cars or houses, and what that means for the economy”)
(Source: bostonreview, via misandry-mermaid)
We won’t speak about how it was 33 degrees this morning…